The Merit-Based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) has been an integral part of the healthcare landscape for nearly eight years. Despite its intended purpose of enhancing healthcare quality and efficiency, many providers continue to grapple with ongoing confusion regarding MIPS rules and measures. Let’s explore the lingering uncertainty surrounding MIPS complexities and offers strategies for successful navigation.
MIPS: Not One-Size-Fits-All
MIPS is a multifaceted program, consisting of the Quality, Cost, Promoting Interoperability, and Improvement Activities performance categories. The scoring system incorporates quality performance benchmarks, updated annually, that measure your performance compared to that of your peers in the same category. The number of available measures often leaves providers struggling to determine and decipher which measures are most relevant to their practice. Providers often default to pre-selecting measures that appear to be easy to meet or align with their specialty. However, as the program’s performance thresholds rise, these once-reliable tactics become less effective. The overuse of common measures can lead to lowered scoring, retired measures, or reduced benchmarks.
Impact on Reimbursement
One of the primary MIPS concerns for providers is its effect on reimbursement. The MIPS program is budget-neutral, meaning that it redistributes funds among providers based on their performance. Underperformance or non-participation can lead to financial penalties, which are then distributed to clinicians who exceed the minimum score for the performance year. And while incentives are capped at a certain percentage, they rarely reach that maximum, therefore falling short of revenue expectations. Understanding how MIPS influences reimbursement is pivotal, as it can significantly impact a provider’s financial bottom line. No one wants to lose a percentage of their Medicare Part B reimbursements, so MIPS participation in all applicable categories is important.
Strategies for Navigating MIPS Successfully
While MIPS presents considerable challenges, there are effective strategies for success. Leveraging technology and data, particularly Electronic Health Records (EHR) and data analytics, can streamline the data collection and reporting process, if there is transparency to the data and an opportunity for correction before submission.
Taking a holistic approach to patient population analysis can help determine the most suitable measures for a group or individual physician, transcending the traditional pre-selection approach. Focusing on measures with robust benchmarks can maximize points, directly correlating with financial gains. A Certified EHR Technology (CEHRT) that leverages electronic Clinical Quality Measures (eCQMs) based on clinical data can provide higher benchmarks, translating to higher points and, ultimately, higher reimbursement.
Conclusion
MIPS remains a pivotal program with the potential to reshape healthcare for the better. However, the prevailing confusion among providers stands as a significant roadblock to its success. Clarity, education, and support are the cornerstones of addressing this issue. By simplifying reporting, offering resources, and promoting transparency, we can empower healthcare providers to excel in MIPS, benefiting both providers and their patients.
Are you ready to optimize your MIPS reporting?
Alpha II provides electronic, end-to-end MIPS reporting through our ONC-certified CEHRT. Our proprietary algorithm assesses 10 million combinations of measures to maximize your MIPS score.
